Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Comic reading for class? Ok!

At first, I was really confused as to why we were reading comics. They reminded me of my philosophy class that I was tortured through last semester, “What are you sitting in? No, that’s not a chair. No, that’s not a seat either. What is truth? Does that desk even exist?” All of these questions hurt my head every time I think of them. The opening of the McCloud iconicity pieces had the same sort of effect. Something that I never discovered in that silly philosophy course was the concept of an icon being an idea, which is what these chapters have shown me. The difference between abstract and realism were portrayed effectively. But what does seeing things vividly have to do with writing? This question I thought to myself reminded me of a writing professor I had freshman year. He always told us, “Don’t tell me the story, show me the story.” He wanted us to be able to take our writing from passive to active, general to specific, and most important, universal to specialized.

The Hyper-Readers reading definitely brought it all together for me. While these cartoons were online and not printed, I definitely found myself skimming them more than actually reading them. In my mind, they were more of an e-text and not a full text text. When things are printed out, I read them easier and critique them more. If it’s on screen, my mind just doesn’t really seem to care as much about them or take them as seriously as the articles in print. It seems like I see the story, but I don’t really read the story. This is what I think reading visually is all about – reading with your eyes and not with your brain. There’s definitely a specific niche for this type of writing, as shown explicitly by McCloud. It’s a learned process, and honestly, I’m not it’s biggest fan.

The A/V projects have been an absolute joy for me to watch. They’ve each had their own special unique flair that has really been interesting to see. Some have been enjoyable like Carson’s elmo story or informative like Matt’s sidewalks. I think it’s neat how we all had the same project, but they each came out completely different. I really like the way that Savannah’s was filmed, but I legitimately have no idea how to do that stuff. I also have a greater appreciation of film majors after this project. They have to have such a creative eye for detail that I never knew about. The biggest problem for me was figuring out something to do that actually mattered. I’ve made picture slideshow things before, but never video with text. There was a huge chunk of nothing that was going on in my video that I was trying to split, but never got it to work out. I couldn’t make it “seam-less” of sorts, and it just looked silly, so I eventually gave up and decided to maybe try it in the future. As for color, my whole video is black and white, text included. I dabbled around a little bit with yellow and blue text coloring, but in the end, I settled for all black and white because I wanted the sort of gloomy-ness. Which is why I chose the music that I did. The music for me gave the whole poem more character and I wanted to see if music could change the watcher’s perspective other than just being based on the video and text alone.

7 comments:

  1. I connect to your point of books being different than etext. Anybody can put text online, but that book in my hands seems to indicate more substantive ideas. While I have this logical argument in my head that valuable ideas can come from many sources, it doesn't always translate into practice.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, I totally agree with this. Anyone can post anything on the internet and they know it. It seems like people don't put as much care into writing when it's just published online and not in print. A good example of that is this blog. I rarely edit it and never even read back through what I just typed before I post it. It's almost like word vomit. I just type what I'm thinking and never really go back to fix it. It just doesn't seem as legit and tangible as a book that I can physically hold. Publishers go to great lengths to find and correct errors in their publications. It almost seems like they take their writing more seriously than internet writers in many cases.

      Delete
  2. Books ought to be seperate. I think there is time and place, like Dave said, sometimes I just want my mind to make the pictures.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Absolutely! People think I'm crazy a lot of times for saying this, but I truly think that words can show us things that images cannot. People always complain about movies never being as good as the book that they're based off of (think Hunger Games or Lord of the Rings). While media is awesome, there's just something about words. Words that spark emotion and building our own pictures in our minds are truly an amazing result of reading. Of course books and movies won't be the same. Word formation and visual sight actually use different sides of the brain. Which is why books and reading to me are so awesome!

      Delete
    2. I explored TLOR and what I enjoyed was experiencing 2 stories. Similar but different in subtle ways. The film was about the environment. The novels more with courage.

      Delete
  3. Hey thanks for the compliment Molly. I thought you did a great job with your poem a/v project. So well good that I actually looked up the poem! So way to be a good rhetor. You are right in saying that our class did a great job!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Savannah! I'm so glad you liked it and looked up the poem. It's seriously one of my favorites since I was a little kid :)

      Delete